I am very grateful to Avram Rosen who is helping me through my divorce now and I highly recommend him to anyone who needs a superb lawyer to handle his/her divorce process. Mr. Rosen has a brilliant strategic mind and has been zealously protecting my rights and interests since my first consultation in his office. Avram is generous with his time and during his lengthy free initial consultation he eased my fears, took my stress away and offered me sound advice and a thoughtful plan of action which later proved to be a genius one. From the very beginning of the divorce process Avram made sure that my rights are being protected and has successfully filed and won a few motions that drastically changed my situation for the better. Avram seems to always be a couple steps ahead of the opposing side and his problem solving skills in the legal field are very developed – he seems to know all the ins and outs of family law. In addition to his legal experience, Mr. Rosen understands human psychology, which came in very handy when dealing with some issues of my divorce. I would also like to give special thanks to his paralegal, Stacy, who is very experienced and is always ready to help with any issues or questions you may have. Avram is always reasonable when it comes to billing and Stacey continually keeps me up to date with detailed invoices so that I could know where I stand. I feel very comfortable being represented by Mr. Rosen because he has proven himself to be extremely talented and passionate in his line of work and will fight tooth and nail to make sure that his clients come out on top.

Case Notes: Incarceration and termination of parental rights

Under Pennsylvania law, a parent's rights may be terminated if the parent has "abandoned" the child and not sought contact for at least 6 months. In a recent case, the Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled that an incarcerated father should have his parental rights terminated. See In re: Z.P., 994 A.2d 1108 (Pa. Super 2010).

The Superior Court noted that incarceration alone does not warrant a termination of the imprisoned parents rights. Instead, the court must look at whether the incarcerated parent used the resources available in prison to attempt to maintain a bond with the child. The Trial Court found that father sent a birthday card and pictures of himself and made diligent efforts to locate the child.

However, the Superior Court found that the father was not able to meet the needs of the young child and would remain incarcerated for some time along. The Court also expressed concerns over father's sobriety and housing situation. Also, father had never sent any money for the child (despite receiving SSD payments) and fell into recidivism over a 9 year period. Finally, the court found that the child had no bond with father.

This case is indicative of the factually intensive nature of cases involving termination of parental rights. Such cases are typically won or lost on the individual facts of the case, rather than broad legal principles.

As always, speak to your attorney before applying this case to your circumstances. In the interest of clarity, I did not address several aspects of this opinion. Also, almost all rules have exceptions and the exceptions often have exceptions.